Topic 33 Left Economic Vision (Series) Response 2 of 2 harelb "Z" 9:44 pm Dec 6, 1992 /* Written 5:59 pm Nov 20, 1992 by harelb@math.cornell.edu in igc:zmagazine */ From: harelb@math.cornell.edu (Harel Barzilai) Subject: Left Economic Vision (Series) ...continuation of... =========================== W H Y S O C I A L I S M ? --------------------------- By Albert Einstein =========================== From Monthly Review, New York, May, 1949. [Re-printed in _Ideas and Opinions_ by Albert Einstein] Transcribed by Joseph Woodard [...] I have now reached the point where I may indicate briefly what to me constitutes the essence of the crisis of our time. It concerns the relationship of the individual to society. The individual has become more conscious than than ever of his dependence upon society. But he does not dependence as a positive asset, as an organic tie, as a protective force, but rather as a threat to his natural rights, or even to his economic existence. Moreover, his position in society is such that the egotistical drives of his make-up are constantly being accentuated, while his social drives, which are by nature weaker, progressively deteriorate. All human beings, whatever their position in society, are suffering from this process of deterioration. Unknowingly prisoners of their own egotism, they feel insecure, lonely, and deprived of the naive, simple, and unsophisticated enjoyment of life. Man can find meaning in life, short and perilous as it is, only through devoting himself to society. The economic anarchy of capitalist society as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of the evil. We see before us a huge community of producers the members of which are unceasingly striving to deprive each other of the fruits of their collective labor -- not by force, but on the whole in faithful compliance with legally established rules. In this respect, it is important to realize that the means of production -- that is to say, the entire productive capacity that is needed for producing consumer goods as well as additional capital goods -- may legally be, and for the most part are, the private property of individuals. For the sake of simplicity, in the discussion that follows I shall call "workers" all those who do not share in the ownership of the means of production -- although this does not quite correspond to the customary use of the term. The owner of the means of production is in a position to purchase the labor power of the worker. By using the means of production, the worker produces new goods which become the property of the capitalist. The essential point about this process is the relation between what the worker produces and what he is paid, both measured in terms of real value. In so far as the labor contract is "free," what the worker receives is determined not by the real value of the goods he produces, but by his minimum needs and by the capitalists' requirements for labor power in relation to the number of workers competing for jobs. It is important to understand that even in theory the payment of the worker is not determined by the value of his product. Private capital tends to become concentrated in few hands, partly because of competition among the capitalists, and partly because technological development and the increasing division of labor encourage the formation of larger units of production at the expense of the smaller ones. The result of these developments is an oligarchy of private capital the enormous power of which cannot be effectively checked even by a democratically organized political society. This is true since the members of legislative bodies are selected by political parties, largely financed or otherwise influenced by private capitalists who, for all practical purposes, separate the electorate from the legislature. The consequence is that the representatives of the people do not in fact sufficiently protect the interests of the underprivileged sections of the population. Moreover, under existing conditions, private capitalists inevitably control, directly or indirectly, the main sources of information (press, radio, education). It is thus extremely difficult, and indeed in most cases quite impossible, for the individual citizen to come to objective conclusions and to make intelligent use of his political rights. The situation prevailing in an economy based on the private ownership of capital is thus characterized main principles: first, means of production (capital) are privately owned and the owners dispose of them as they see fit; second, the labor contract is free. Of course, there is no such thing as a pure capitalist society in this sense. In particular, it should be noted that the workers, through long and bitter political struggles, have succeeded in securing a somewhat improved form of the "free labor contract" for certain categories of workers. But taken as a whole, the present-day economy does not differ much from "pure" capitalism. Production is carried on for profit, not for use. There is no provision that all those able and willing to work will always be in a position to find employment; an "army of unemployed" almost always exists. The worker is constantly in fear of losing his job. Since unemployed and poorly paid workers do not provide a profitable market, the production of consumers' goods is restricted, and great hardship is the consequence. Technological progress frequently results in more unemployment rather than in an easing of the burden of work for all. The profit motive, in conjunction with competition among capitalists, is responsible for an instability in the accumulation and utilization of capital which leads to increasingly severe depressions. Unlimited competition leads to a huge waste of labor, and to that crippling of the social consciousness of individuals which I mentioned before. This crippling of individuals I consider the worst evil of capitalism. Our whole educational system suffers from this evil. An exaggerated competitive attitude is inculcated into the student, who is trained to worship acquisitive success as a preparation for his future career. I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy, accompanied by an educational system which would be oriented toward social goals. In such an economy, the means of production are owned by society itself and are utilized in a planned fashion. A planned economy, which adjusts production to the needs of the community, would distribute the work to be done among all those able to work and would guarantee a livelihood to every man, woman, and child. The education of the individual, in addition to promoting his own innate abilities, would attempt to develop in him a sense of responsibility for his fellow-men in place of the glorification of power and success in our present society. Nevertheless, it is necessary to remember that a planned economy is not yet socialism. A planned economy as such may be accompanied by the complete enslavement of the individual. The achievement of socialism requires the solution of some extremely difficult socio-political problems: how is it possible, in view of the far-reaching centralization of political and economic power, to prevent bureaucracy from becoming all-powerful and overweening? How can the rights of the individual be protected and therewith a democratic counterweight to the power of bureaucracy be assured? ################################################################## - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - "Z is an independent, progressive monthly magazine of critical thinking on political, cultural, social, and economic life in the United States. It sees the racial, sexual, class, and political dimensions of personal life as fundamental to understanding and improving contemporary circumstances; and it aims to assist activist efforts to attain a better future." - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SUBSCRIPTIONS: One Year $26; Two Years $45; Three Years $60 Student/Low-Income: $18 // Sample issue: $5.00 [Libraries/Institutions: $35 ; International: One Year $50] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Z Magazine, // 116 St. Botolph St // Boston MA 02115 // (617)787-4531 (For subscriptions)(no longer "150 W Canton St., // Boston MA 02118") - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Some 70 pages per issue, no advertisements ("Zaps" etc are run free) Z is a project of the nonprofit Institute for Social & Cultural Change - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LETTERS, ARTICLES, ZAPS (activists announcements/press releases -- for free publication in Z): Z magazine, 18 Millfield St., Boston MA 02543 ; (508)548-9063 ================================================================== ################################################################## For more info about PeaceNet (or EcoNet), use the GET command (see below) with the file name PEACENET BROCHURE (respectively, ECONET BROCHURE) PeaceNet and EcoNet are run by the Institute for Global Communications (IGC), a project of the nonprofit Tides Foundation. You can also contact PeaceNet by email at peacenet@igc.org (respectively, econet@igc.org) or support@igc.org ====================================== To get a file named FILE NAME from the archiver (files are two words separa- ted by a space), send the 1-line message GET FILE NAME ACTIV-L to: LISTSERV@MIZZOU1.BITNET [or: LISTSERV@MIZZOU1.MISSOURI.EDU] ====================================== Use GET with the file ACTIV-L ARCHIVE for a listing of files available with the GET command. e.g., send GET ACTIV-L ARCHIVE ACTIV-L to LISTSERV@MIZZOU1.BITNET to be emailed the index of archived files.